Trusted Third Party for service management in vehicular clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As vehicles get smarter, with supplementary onboard gear providing advanced applications and provisioning services related to traffic management, the requirement for simple and effective access to information has grown extensively. The new applications manage more complex operations and, unlike other mobile devices, mobile vehicle devices provide location based services, real-time functionality, provisioning services and storage, all without the shortcomings of traditional mobile devices. Vehicular cloud computing can perform a broad set of on-demand services and applications, which make this method highly applicable to urban settings. Provisioning services often encounter unexpected interruptions that increase provisioning latency and service usage duration, ultimately leading to higher charges for the driver. This paper advances our previously proposed distributed model to handle service management in vehicular clouds, by using the concept of Vehicular Trusted Third Party (VTTP) with different type of provisioning services. This model has the capability to switch between TTPs, which allows drivers to exploit the benefits of different existing services, and connect to the TTP that best meets their specific requirements. Two new service latency modes are proposed and evaluated: Service Latency Sensitive Mode (SLSM) and Neutral mode. The proposed model has been implemented and evaluated using simulations of real-time light and heavy duty services, and various simulation scenarios show that using a VTTP can significantly help drivers reduce their service latency (~30%) and costs (~26%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".