La pédagogie progressiste à l’université : l’expérience de la Maîtresse d’école
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Maîtresse d’école est un groupe de pédagogues qui, depuis 1975, dans le cadre de la formation universitaire des enseignants au Québec s’efforce de promouvoir une « pédagogie progressiste » qu’il définit en ces termes : « lier l’école à la réalité quotidienne de la majorité, soit principalement les travailleurs ». En 1978-79, la Maîtresse d’école a entrepris l’élaboration, avec des enseignants en formation, d’un cahier de pédagogie progressiste. Le cahier est consacré aux conditions de vie des travailleurs des mines d’amiante de Thetford-Mines au Québec. L’article, outre la présentation de groupe, relate les démarches concrètes de préparation du cahier, les rencontres avec les travailleurs, leur syndicat, les visites sur place, le processus de production de cet instrument pédagogique et l’accueil accordé au cahier par les enseignants locaux qui doivent l’utiliser dans leurs classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".