MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737521656 · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.013

Report of the ISHLT Working Group on primary lung graft dysfunction Part IV: Prevention and treatment: A 2016 Consensus Group statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

2017· editorial· en· W2737521656 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk Van Raemdonck, Matthew G. Hartwig, Marshall I. Hertz, R. Duane Davis, Marcelo Cypel, Don Hayes, Steve Ivulich, Jasleen Kukreja, Erika D. Lease, Gabriel Loor, Olaf Mercier, Luca Paoletti, J. Parmar, Reinaldo Rampolla, Keith Wille, Rajat Walia, Shaf Keshavjee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsMedicineLung transplantationLungCardiologyPulmonary hypertensionTransplantationInternal medicineHypoxemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0160.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207