Multipl Skleroz’lu Bireylerde Kanada Aktivite Performans Ölçümü’nün Türkçe Kültürel Adaptasyonu, Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Torpil B., Turkish Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in People with Multiple Sclerosis, Hacettepe University Institute of Health Science Occupational Therapy Program Master Thesis, Ankara, 2017. This study was conducted to determine whether people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) was designed to investigate the adaptation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), a client centered outcome measure, to Turkish. People with MS scores of 24 or higher were included in the study to the Mini Mental State Examination. The translation procedure defined by the World Health Organization has been implemented. After the Turkish translation, the questionnaire was translated into English by a team of native speakers. The final form of the scale was determined by discussing the necessary cultural adaptations by the jury. People with MS were implemented re-test one week after the assessments. During the process, there was no problem in adapting the questionnaire to the Turkish culture. As a result of these evaluations, 342 occupations in which people with MS had problems with COPM were determined. People with MS indicated the most problematic activities in self-care. One of the most problematic activities of people is the use of public transportation and the climbing of stairs. The validity of COPM was determined by looking at the correlation between the Health Assessment Questionnaire, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 physical and cognitive scores. As a result of these examinations, it was determined that the COPM was a valid measurement. On the reliability test, test retest and internal consistency coefficient were checked. Cronbach's Alfa internal consistency coefficient was evaluated after re-testing with one week's search. The internal consistency coefficient was found to be in the range of 0.9-1 and it was found that the COPM was reliable at the perfect level. In conclusion, the Turkish version of COPM was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used academically and clinically in people with MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".