“ESTADO DA ARTE” SOBRE AS PUBLICAÇÕES CIENTÍFICAS ENVOLVENDO O TRABALHO AGRÍCOLA FAMILIAR NO BRASIL SOB O PONTO DE VISTA ERGONÔMICO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O trabalho agrícola é uma atividade que requer esforço físico e demanda alto consumo de energia humana. Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar as produções científicas nacionais sobre a Ergonomia do Trabalho Agrícola Familiar do Brasil nos dias atuais. Para tanto, foi utilizado o método da revisão integrativa da literatura por meio de busca on-line nos Periódicos da Capes, Scientific Electronic Library Online e Google Acadêmico, considerando-se as publicações entre 2005 a 2015. Foram identificadas vinte e duas publicações que abordaram à temática de interesse, porém, é limitado o número de pesquisas que relacionam diretamente as questões relativas ao trabalho agrícola familiar sob a perspectiva da ergonomia. Existem, sim, mais pesquisas voltadas para a Análise da Ergonomia do Trabalho no que refere ao uso de equipamentos, ferramentas, operação de tratores e máquinas agrícolas diversas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".