MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737797553 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00312.2017

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity and volume-regulating factors in healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women

2017· article· en· W2737797553 on OpenAlexafffund
Nisha Charkoudian, Charlotte W. Usselman, Rachel J. Skow, Jeffery S. Staab, Colleen G. Julian, Michael K. Stickland, Radha Chari, Rshmi Khurana, Sandra T. Davidge, Margie H. Davenport, Craig D. Steinback

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentFogarty International CenterHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsInternal medicineVasopressinEndocrinologyPlasma renin activityPlasma osmolalityMedicineBlood pressureBlood volumePregnancyRenin–angiotensin systemAldosteroneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthy, normotensive human pregnancies are associated with striking increases in both plasma volume and vascular sympathetic nerve activity (SNA). In nonpregnant humans, volume-regulatory factors including plasma osmolality, vasopressin, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have important modulatory effects on control of sympathetic outflow. We hypothesized that pregnancy would be associated with changes in the relationships between SNA (measured as muscle SNA) and volume-regulating factors, including plasma osmolality, plasma renin activity, and arginine vasopressin (AVP). We studied 46 healthy, normotensive young women (23 pregnant and 23 nonpregnant). We measured SNA, arterial pressure, plasma osmolality, plasma renin activity, AVP, and other volume-regulatory factors in resting, semirecumbent posture. Pregnant women had significantly higher resting SNA (38 ± 12 vs. 23 ± 6 bursts/min in nonpregnant women), lower osmolality, and higher plasma renin activity and aldosterone (all P < 0.05). Group mean values for AVP were not different between groups [4.64 ± 2.57 (nonpregnant) vs. 5.17 ± 2.03 (pregnant), P > 0.05]. However, regression analysis detected a significant relationship between individual values for SNA and AVP in pregnant ( r = 0.71, P < 0.05) but not nonpregnant women ( r = 0.04). No relationships were found for other variables. These data suggest that the link between AVP release and resting SNA becomes stronger in pregnancy, which may contribute importantly to blood pressure regulation in healthy women during pregnancy. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sympathetic nerve activity and blood volume are both elevated during pregnancy, but blood pressure is usually normal. Here, we identified a relationship between vasopressin and sympathetic nerve activity in pregnant but not nonpregnant women. This may provide mechanistic insights into blood pressure regulation in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy-related hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207