MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737865042 · doi:10.1007/978-93-86279-16-3_5

André Weil: The Man and the Historian of Mathematics

2004· book-chapter· en· W2737865042 on OpenAlexaff
Norbert Schlomiuk

Bibliographic record

VenueHindustan Book Agency · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebraic numberAlgebraic geometryDifferential (mechanical device)Algebra over a fieldHistory of mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematics educationPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

André Weil [1906–1998] was one of the great mathematicians of the XX-th century. A visionary mathematician he left fundamental contributions to the main domains of pure mathematics: Algebraic Geometry, Number Theory, Differential and Algebraic Topology, Analysis, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras. The breadth of André Weil’s mathematics is extraordinary and rare among contemporary mathematicians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHindustan Book AgencySame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207