MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737866760 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2017.081.051

Heyerdahlite, Na<sub>3</sub>Mn<sub>7</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub>F(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>, a new mineral of the astrophyllite supergroup from the Larvik Plutonic complex, Norway: Description and crystal structure

2017· article· en· W2737866760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemCrystallographySupergroupMohs scale of mineral hardnessAegirineCrystal structureNephelineChemistryOctahedronMineralMineralogyGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Heyerdahlite, ideally Na 3 Mn 7 Ti 2 (Si 4 O 12 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 4 F(H 2 O) 2 , is a new astrophyllite-supergroup mineral from the Larvik Plutonic complex, Norway. Heyerdahlite was found in a nepheline-syenite pegmatite with albite, aegirine, hastingsite/magnesio-hastingsite, kupletskite, lorenzenite and pyrophanite. Heyerdahlite is colourless to pale brown, transparent and has a vitreous lustre. Mohs hardness is 3, D calc. = 3.245 g/cm 3 . Heyerdahlite is biaxial (+), α = 1.694(2), β = 1.710(5), γ = 1.730(5), 2V meas. = 80(4)° and 2V calc. = 84.5°. Cleavage is perfect parallel to {001}. The empirical formula based on 32.18 (O + F) apfu is (Na 1.18 K 0.68 Rb 0.12 Cs 0.01 Pb 0.01 ) Σ2 Na 1.00 (Mn 6.29 Zn 0.23 Mg 0.07 Zr 0.04 ${\rm Fe}_{{\rm 0}{\rm. 03}}^{{\rm 2 +}} $ Ca 0.01 Na 0.34 ) Σ7.01 (Ti 1.78 Nb 0.17 Mg 0.03 Zr 0.02 ) Σ2 (Si 8.03 O 24 )O 2 [(OH) 3.92 F 0.08 ] Σ4 F 1.00 [(H 2 O) 1.18 □ 0.82 ] Σ2 , for Z = 1. Heyerdahlite is triclinic, space group P $\bar 1$ , a = 5.392(2), b = 11.968(4), c = 11.868(4) Å, α = 112.743(8), β = 94.816(7), γ = 103.037(8)° and V = 675.6(7) Å 3 . The crystal structure was refined to R 1 = 4.44% for 3577 unique ( F o &gt; 4σ F ) reflections. In the crystal structure of heyerdahlite, there are four [4] T sites occupied by Si. The [6] D site is occupied mainly by Ti. The T 4 O 12 astrophyllite ribbons composed of SiO 4 tetrahedra and D octahedra constitute the H (Heteropolyhedral) sheet. In the O (Octahedral) sheet, there are four Mn-dominant [6] M (1–4) sites. Two H sheets and one central O sheet form the HOH block, and adjacent HOH blocks link via a common ${\rm X}_{\rm D}^{\rm P} $ anion of the two D octahedra. In the I (Intermediate) block between HOH blocks, there are two interstitial cation sites, A and B , and a W A site, partly occupied by H 2 O. The A site splits into two sites, [12] A (1) and [6] A (2), partly occupied by K and Na, respectively, with A(1)–A(2) = 0.754 Å. The aggregate content of the A site is ideally Na 2 apfu. The [10] B site is occupied by Na. The W A site is ideally occupied by (H 2 O) 2 pfu. The mineral is named after the Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl (1914–2002), who was born in Larvik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0120.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0120.009
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it