MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738106432 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05799

Enhancement of Pd Catalytic Activity toward Ethanol Electrooxidation by Atomic Layer Deposition of SnO<sub>2</sub> onto TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanotubes

2017· article· en· W2738106432 on OpenAlexaff
Maïssa K. S. Barr, Loïc Assaud, Nicolas Brazeau, Margrit Hanbücken, Spyridon Ntais, Lionel Santinacci, Elena A. Baranova

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsChronoamperometryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCyclic voltammetryCatalysisAtomic layer depositionPalladiumMaterials scienceChemical engineeringAnnealing (glass)Transmission electron microscopyElectrochemistryLayer (electronics)NanoparticleStoichiometryNanotechnologyInorganic chemistryChemistryPhysical chemistryElectrodeMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium nanoparticles and SnO 2 layers have been grown by two successive steps of atomic layer deposition onto TiO 2 nanotubes (TNTs). The three-dimensional nanostructured catalytic systems have been studied for ethanol electrooxidation in alkaline media. Characterization by scanning and transmission electron microscopies, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction indicates the high conformity, the high purity, and the perfect stoichiometry of Pd and SnO 2 deposits onto the TNTs. The electrochemical investigations performed by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry have revealed the beneficial effect of the annealing of the support toward ethanol electrooxidation reaction. The comparison of the catalytic activity with literature shows that such SnO 2 -based substrates exhibits highly promising performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207