Les représentations des Autochtones dans les manuels scolaires et le respect de la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les manuels scolaires sont des artéfacts culturels illustrant des valeurs, des idéologies et des croyances. Afin d’en approfondir le contenu latent, une analyse critique du discours a été effectuée au sein de neuf manuels qui étaient recommandés pour introduire les notions relatives à la citoyenneté en cinquième et sixième année dans les écoles de langue française de l’Ontario. Les données ont été questionnées sous trois angles : la structure et les caractéristiques, la construction des personnages et les omissions. La recherche révèle que le discours portant sur les représentations des Autochtones ne respecte pas l’article 28 et l’article 29 de la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant. Les suggestions qui découlent de cette recherche devraient affiner l’évaluation des futures publications afin que les représentations des communautés autochtones au sein du matériel scolaire soient plus justes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".