MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738172456 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630104

Shape and spin determination of Barbarian asteroids

2017· article· en· W2738172456 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxime Devogèle, P. Tanga, Philippe Bendjoya, J. P. Rivet, Jean Surdej, J. Hanuš, Lyu Abe, P. Antonini, R. Artola, M. Audejean, R. Behrend, Fabian Berski, J. G. Bosch, M. Bronikowska, A. Carbognani, F. Char, M.-J. Kim, Young‐Jun Choi, Carlos Colazo, J. M. Coloma, D. M. Coward, Russell I. Durkee, O. Erece, E. Forné, Paul Hickson, R. Hirsch, J. Horbowicz, K. Kamínski, P. Kankiewicz, Murat Kaplan, T. Kwiatkowski, I. Konstanciak, A. Kruszewki, V. Kudak, F. Manzini, Hong-Kyu Moon, A. Marciniak, M. Murawiecka, Jakub Nadolny, W. Ogłoza, J. L. Ortiz, Dagmara Oszkiewicz, H. Pallares, N. Peixinho, R. Poncy, F. Reyes, J.A. de los Reyes, T. Santana-Ros, K. Sobkowiak, S. Pastor, Frederick Pilcher, Myriam Quiñones, P. Trela, David Vernet

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de LiègeAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaNarodowym Centrum NaukiChina National Textile and Apparel CouncilTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsAsteroidBarbarianPhotometry (optics)PolarimetryContext (archaeology)AstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsGeologyScatteringGeographyStarsOpticsPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. The so-called Barbarian asteroids share peculiar, but common polarimetric properties, probably related to both their shape and composition. They are named after (234) Barbara, the first on which such properties were identified. As has been suggested, large scale topographic features could play a role in the polarimetric response, if the shapes of Barbarians are particularly irregular and present a variety of scattering/incidence angles. This idea is supported by the shape of (234) Barbara, that appears to be deeply excavated by wide concave areas revealed by photometry and stellar occultations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207