Shell versus Core Dy<sup>3+</sup> Contributions to NMR Water Relaxation in Sodium Lanthanide Fluoride Core–Shell Nanoparticles. An Investigation Using O-17 and H-1 NMR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lanthanide nanoparticles (NPs) are useful as paramagnetic contrast agents in MRI, generating contrast through enhanced relaxation of signals from water protons in their vicinity. The overall relaxation depends on the proximity of the water, so that lanthanides at the NP surface would be expected to make a contribution greater than those buried in the core. NPs are usually coated with an organic layer to attain colloidal stability, which will influence the access of water to the lanthanide constituents. Here, we interrogated the relative contributions of NP core versus surface lanthanides to overall water relaxation using a series of core–shell lanthanide fluoride NPs (typical core dimension of 15.5–19.5 nm, and typical shell dimension of 0.5 nm) wherein the core and/or shell regions contained either a contrast-active lanthanide (paramagnetic; dysprosium, Dy 3+ ) or a contrast-inactive lanthanide (diamagnetic; yttrium, Y 3+ ), variously designated Dy–Dy, Dy–Y, Y–Dy, or Y–Y core–shell NPs. The organic coating in each case consisted of a monolayer of oleate (OA) bound to the positively charged nanoparticle surface, intercalated with an outer layer of poly(maleic anhydride- alt -1-octadecene)–polyethylene glycol (PMAO–PEG). Paramagnetic influences were assessed via changes in water 17 O chemical shift and 1 H T 1 relaxivity. 17 O chemical shift changes were minimal, even for Dy–Dy and Y–Dy NPs, consistent with a limited access of water to the NP surface, likely due to occlusion by the OA portion of the organic coating. Nevertheless, water 1 H T 1 relaxivity was enhanced by a factor of 40 for Dy–Dy relative to Y–Y NPs, reflecting the predominant through-space 1 H dipolar relaxation mechanism. Both Y–Dy and Dy–Y core–shell NPs exhibited water 1 H T 1 relaxivity intermediate to that of Dy–Dy and Y–Y core–shell NPs. Modeling of the 1/ r 6 dependence of the dipolar coupling between lanthanide and water indicates that in the presence of the OA/PMAO–PEG organic coating only the outermost layer of NP lanthanides contributes to the relaxation. This suggest that for the Y–Dy and Dy–Y core–shell NPs the as-prepared shells may not be of homogeneous composition and/or thickness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".