Deep neural network with attention model for scene text recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors present a deep neural network (DNN) with attention model for scene text recognition. The proposed model does not require any segmentation of the input text image. The framework is inspired by the attention model presented recently for speech recognition and image captioning. In the proposed framework, feature extraction, feature attention and sequence recognition are integrated in a jointly trainable network. Compared with previous approaches, the following contributions are mainly made. (i) The attention model is applied into DNN to recognise scene text, and it can effectively solve the sequence recognition problem caused by variable length labels. (ii) Rigorous experiments are performed across a number of challenging benchmarks, including IIIT5K, SVT, ICDAR2003 and ICDAR2013 datasets. Results in experiments show that the proposed model is comparable or better than the state‐of‐the‐art methods. (iii) This model only contains 6.5 million parameters. Compared with other DNN models for scene text recognition, this model has the least number of parameters so far.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it