MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738373466 · doi:10.1177/070674370104600914

Book Review: Freud and Psychoanalysis

2001· article· en· W2738373466 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stanley E. Greben

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalysisPsychologyPsychoanalytic theoryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

in sight ful, and very in for ma tive for couples want ing to im prove their level of com mu ni ca tion and to un der stand each other bet ter in the face of eve ry day obsta cles.Bowles has done a nice job of con vey ing the es sen tials of ef fec tive inter ac tion in a prac ti cal and highly applied man ner. Psy cho ther apy: Ind vid ualFreud and Psy cho analy sis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207