MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738389729 · doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22057

Determinants and Characteristics of Bruch's Membrane Opening and Bruch's Membrane Opening–Minimum Rim Width in a Normal Japanese Population

2017· article· en· W2738389729 on OpenAlex
Makoto Araie, Aiko Iwase, Kazuhisa Sugiyama, Toru Nakazawa, Goji Tomita, Masanori Hangai, Yasuo Yanagi, Hiroshi Murata, Hidenobu Tanihara, Claude F. Burgoyne, Balwantray C. Chauhan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsBruch's membraneNerve fiber layerRetinalOphthalmologyPopulationOptical coherence tomographyOptic diskAnatomyMedicineRetinal pigment epithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To identify determinants of Bruch's membrane opening (BMO), and BMO-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) centered on BMO center and characterize these parameters in a normal Japanese population. Methods: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images of optic nerve head and circumpapillary and macular retina were obtained in 258 eyes of 258 normal Japanese with mean (standard deviation) age of 51.7 (18.2) years. BMO area, BMO-MRW, RNFLT (measured with a 3.5-mm-diameter circle scan) were all acquired and analyzed relative to the eye-specific fovea to BMO (FoBMO) axis. One randomly selected eye of each subject was analyzed. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify determinants to the parameters. Results: BMO area, global BMO-MRW, RNFLT, and FoBMO angle averaged 2.06 (0.45) mm2, 305.5 (50.0) μm, 101.8 (9.6) μm, and -7.8° (3.8°), respectively. There was a modest correlation between global BMO-MRW and RNFLT (r = 0.337; P < 0.001), while the sectorwise correlations were highest in the superior-temporal sector (r = 0.500; P < 0.001) and lowest in the nasal sector (r = 0.117; P = 0.063). Global BMO-MRW and RNFLT declined with age at -1.04 μm/y (P < 0.001) and -0.12 μm/y (P = 0.001), and the former correlated negatively (P = 0.001) and the latter positively (P < 0.001) with BMO area after adjustment for other factors (R2 = 0.191 and 0.272, respectively). BMO area correlated positively with axial length (P = 0.023) and negatively with age (P < 0.001) (R2 = 0.157). Conclusions: BMO-MRW and RNFLT declined with age with a difference between them in their relationship to BMO area. BMO area positively correlated with axial length and negatively with age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it