Ensuring two routes connectivity in mobile ad hoc networks with Random Waypoint mobility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To increase mobile ad hoc network reliability, virtually decrease the packets loss to zero, and to support multimedia communications multi-route is required. In order to ensure the availability of two routes, node density must be above a certain value. To the best our knowledge, this paper is the first paper that mathematically determines the required node density to ensure the availability of two routes between any randomly chosen source and destination pair in mobile ad hoc networks with random waypoint mobility model. To this end, a complete probabilistic model is provided. The obtained results reveal that the increase in the node density exponentially increases the probability of having two routes. This exponential increase is limited by a certain threshold, after this threshold the increase is negligible. An interesting conclusion from this paper is that the required node densities to ensure two routes connectivity are the same for both mobile nodes moving according to the generalized random waypoint mobility model and static nodes that are uniformly distributed in the network area. This work can be used by mobile ad hoc network designers to study the network reliability and connectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".