RAILAS Lauri, The Rise of the LEX ELECTRONICA and the International Sale of Goods Publication of the faculty of law, University of Helsinski, Helsinski, 2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ouvrage constitue la these de Doctorat de Monsieur Lauri Railas soutenue le 16 Octobre 2004 a la faculte de droit de l’Universite de Helsinki. Expert reconnu en droit du commerce international, son parcours professionnel explique les orientations prises dans son etude et son approche tres large des transactions relatives a la vente internationale de marchandises comparativement a d’autres travaux dans le meme domaine. L’auteur a ete conseiller juridique a l’Institut d’arbitrage de la chambre de commerce centrale finlandaise puis secretaire general de la section finlandaise de la chambre internationale de commerce. Il a, ensuite, occupe le poste d’administrateur principal au secretariat general du conseil de l’Union Europeenne entre 1996 et 2002. Il est, actuellement, associe senior chez Krogerus & Co, un des plus importants cabinets d’avocats de Finlande.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".