Cooperative Vision-Based Object Transportation by Two Humanoid Robots in a Cluttered Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although in recent years, there have been quite a few studies aimed at the navigation of robots in cluttered environments, few of these have addressed the problem of robots navigating while moving a large or heavy object. Such a functionality is especially useful when transporting objects of different shapes and weights without having to modify the robot hardware. In this work, we tackle the problem of making two humanoid robots navigate in a cluttered environment while transporting a very large object that simply could not be moved by a single robot. We present a complete navigation scheme, from the incremental construction of a map of the environment and the computation of collision-free trajectories to the design of the control to execute those trajectories. We present experiments made on real NAO robots, equipped with RGB-D sensors mounted on their heads, moving an object around obstacles. Our experiments show that a significantly large object can be transported without modifying the robot main hardware, and therefore that our scheme enhances the humanoid robots capacities in real-life situations. Our contributions are: (1) a low-dimension multi-robot motion planning algorithm that finds an obstacle-free trajectory, by using the constructed map of the environment as an input, (2) a framework that produces continuous and consistent odometry data, by fusing the visual and the robot odometry information, (3) a synchronization system that uses the projection of the robots based on their hands positions coupled with the visual feedback error computed from a frontal camera, (4) an efficient real-time whole-body control scheme that controls the motions of the closed-loop robot–object–robot system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it