MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738566553 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.04787

Anisotropic space-time adaptation for reaction-diffusion problems

2017· preprint· en· W2738566553 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Edward Boey, Yves Bourgault, Thierry Giordano

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)AnisotropyAnisotropic diffusionReaction–diffusion systemDiffusionSpace (punctuation)SpacetimeStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsOpticsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A residual error estimator is proposed for the energy norm of the error for a scalar reaction-diffusion problem and for the monodomain model used in cardiac electrophysiology. The problem is discretized using $P_1$ finite elements in space, and the backward difference formula of second order (BDF2) in time. The estimator for space makes use of anisotropic interpolation estimates, assuming only minimal regularity. Reliability of the estimator is proven under certain mild assumptions on the convergence of the approximate solution. The monodomain model couples a nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation (PDE) with an ordinary differential equation (ODE) and this setting presents challenges theoretically as well as numerically. A space-time adaptation algorithm is proposed to control the global error, using a non-Euclidean metric for mesh adaptation and a simple method to adjust the time step. Numerical examples are used to verify the reliability and efficiency of the estimator, and to test the adaptive algorithm. The potential gains in efficiency of the proposed algorithm compared to methods using uniform meshes is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207