MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738590523 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021048

Pseudogap and Fermi-Surface Topology in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model

2018· article· en· W2738590523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchNational Supercomputing Centre SingaporeMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeArmy Research OfficeFlatiron HealthInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueCenovus EnergyCentro Svizzero di Calcolo ScientificoNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaDeutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der WissenschaftenH2020 European Research CouncilIndustry CanadaSimons Foundation
KeywordsPseudogapTopology (electrical circuits)Hubbard modelSuperconductivityFermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent experiments on the normal state of high-temperature superconductors have found a surprising link between the existence of a pseudogap and changes in the topology of the Fermi surface. A new theoretical and computational analysis explores this connection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it