The Falls Of Niagara: Being A Complete Guide To All The Points Of Interest Around And In The Immediate Neighborhood Of The Great Cataract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Falls of Niagara may justly be classed among the wonders of the world-They are the pride of America, and their grandeur, magnitude, and magnificence are well known to all the civilized world.Ever since the discovery of this wonderful cataract, millions have flocked thither from all countries to gaze with feelings of the deep- est solemnity on the tumultuous fall of waters, and to adore the power and majesty of the Almighty as these are exhibited and realized amid the sublime scenery of this stupendous waterfall.In the following pages we shall attempt to guide the traveller to the various points whence the finest views of the Falls may be obtained, and, thereafter, conduct him to the spots of peculiar interest in their neighbourhood.(17) The great lakes of North America-Superior, Michi- gan, Huron, and Erie-pour the flood of their accumu- lated waters into Lake Ontario through a channel of about 36 miles in length.This channel is named the Niagara Eiver, and is part of the boundary between Canada and the State of New York.Twenty-two miles below its commencement at Lake Erie occur the famous Falls of Niagara.These Falls are divided into two by Iris or Goat Island.The American Falls are 900 feet wide, by 164 feet high.The Horse-Shoe or Canadian Fall is 2000 feet wide, and 153 feet high.The origin of the name is uncertain, but it is supposed to be of Iroquois extraction, and to signify the "Thunder of Waters."The roar of the Falls is sometimes heard at a great dis- Buflfalo on Lake Erie, and 300 by raQ from Albany.Being a fashionable place of resort during summer and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".