MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738647129 · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/69/3/241

Solution of Spin and Pseudo-Spin Symmetric Dirac Equation in (1+1) Space-Time Using Tridiagonal Representation Approach

2018· article· en· W2738647129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Theoretical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixDirac equationWave functionScalar (mathematics)Mathematical physicsGamma matricesSpinorMathematicsDirac algebraQuantum mechanicsOrthogonal polynomialsWave equationRelativistic wave equationsLaguerre polynomialsPhysicsMathematical analysisEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of this work is to find exact solutions of the Dirac equation in (1+1) space-time beyond the already known class. We consider exact spin (and pseudo-spin) symmetric Dirac equations where the scalar potential is equal to plus (and minus) the vector potential. We also include pseudo-scalar potentials in the interaction. The spinor wavefunction is written as a bounded sum in a complete set of square integrable basis, which is chosen such that the matrix representation of the Dirac wave operator is tridiagonal and symmetric. This makes the matrix wave equation a symmetric three-term recursion relation for the expansion coefficients of the wavefunction. We solve the recursion relation exactly in terms of orthogonal polynomials and obtain the state functions and corresponding relativistic energy spectrum and phase shift .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it