Universidade e formação de recursos humanos: características culturais básicas na formação das competências e habilidades do administrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As efetivas transformações por que passam as sociedades mundiais vêm exigindo mudanças radicais na educação. A natureza das relações escola/trabalho necessita mudar, de sorte que possibilite formar adequadamente a nova força de trabalho. Nesse contexto, merece destaque a educação do administrador, que, na visão atual e futura, precisa ser permanente, em constante aperfeiçoamento, na busca de títulos acadêmicos. Por sua vez, a legislação do ensino superior possibilita a criação de projetos educacionais que se compatibilizem com o objetivo de oferecer propostas pedagógicas realísticas e de qualidade. Assim, discute-se as competências que os trabalhadores da área das ciências sociais de Administração necessitam receber durante o curso de graduação. Contudo, torna-se oportuno alertar para as questões culturais inerentes ao indivíduo, pois são elas os elementos mediadores entre as competências e o desempenho nas atividades organizacionais. Palavras-chave: mudanças; formação; base cultural; administrador. Abstract The effective changes that the world societies have gone through claim for radical changes in education. The nature of the School x Labor relationship has to be transformed so that the new workforce can be adequately educated. In this context, special attention should be given to de worker's education that must be permanent, constantly improving in search for an academic title, according to de present and future view. On the other hand, the law ruling the High Studies is favorable to the creation of educational projects compatible with the objectives to offer real pedagogical and qualified proposes. So, the debate of the competency that the workers in the area of social science of Administration is about what they need to learn during graduation. However, this is an opportune moment to alert to the cultural questions proper of the individual, because it is the mediator elements between the competency and the performance in the organizational activities. Keywords: education changes; professional formation; cultural basis; administrator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".