MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738759978 · doi:10.1002/9781118945568.ch21

Adventive (Non‐Native) Insects and the Consequences for Science and Society of Species that Become Invasive

2017· other· en· W2738759978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfred G. Wheeler, E. Richard Hoebeke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyInvasive speciesBiologyRange (aeronautics)FaunaIntroduced speciesClimate changeBiological pest control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasion biology now has a central role in biotic conservation, and invasive species are used as tools for biogeographic, ecological, and evolutionary research. This chapter discusses adventive insects that are immigrant or introduced, with an emphasis on North America. Examples deal mainly with human-assisted movement of insects between countries, even though intracountry changes in range are common among immigrant taxa (e.g., the glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca coagulata) and western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera) within the United States). The chapter gives little attention to immigrants that arrive on their own by active flight, or by passive conveyance on convective air currents or strong winds associated with El Nino events, and discusses those that expand their ranges as the result of global climate change. An anthocorid bug (Anthocoris nemoralis) was introduced for biological control in western North America. The Canadian fauna also includes more than 300 species introduced for biological control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207