MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738788403 · doi:10.21521/mw.5752

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of a concealed accessory pathway of the heart in a Labrador Retriever

2017· article· en· W2738788403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak, G. McAulay, Artur Fuglewicz, Krzysztof Nowak, Adrian Janiszewski, Piotr Skrzypczak, Marcin Michałek, Alicja Cepiel, Urszula Pasławska

Bibliographic record

VenueMedycyna Weterynaryjna · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccessory pathwayMedicineOrthodromicAblationTachycardiaCardiologyCatheter ablationInternal medicineElectrophysiology studyLabrador RetrieverElectrical conduction system of the heartCatheterRadiofrequency ablationElectrophysiologyAnesthesiaElectrocardiographySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of an accessory atrioventricular conduction pathway may provide the anatomical basis for some tachyarrhythmias. Persistent tachyarrythmias may result in the development of systolic dysfunction or tachycardiomyopathy and eventual progression to heart failure. In this paper we report the successful ablation of an accessory pathway involved in the pathogenesis of persistent orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) and heart failure in a 3-year-old male Labrador retriever. Electrophysiological study and radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were performed under general anesthesia. Electrophysiological study revealed AVRT resulting from a retrograde conduction via a right posteroseptal accessory pathway. The successful RF ablation of the accessory pathway resulted in the resolution of the tachycardia and return of normal sinus rhythm. Medical management of heart failure was withdrawn and no episodes of recurrent tachyarrhythmia were documented during a 3-month follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedycyna WeterynaryjnaSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207