MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2738799720

A presença do exílio na literatura quebequense: escrita migrante e autonarração / The presence of the exile in the literature of Quebec: migrant writing and self-narration

2017· article· pt· W2738799720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luciano Passos Moraes

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHumanitiesArtSociologyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente trabalho tem por objetivo explorar o tema do exílio na literatura quebequense contemporânea, sob o viés da escrita migrante e da autonarração empreendida por escritores exilados, com vistas a verificar as relações que se estabelecem entre os eixos coletivo e individual e suas implicações no contexto das literaturas transnacionais. Tomando como ponto de partida autores que pensam o lugar do sujeito imigrante no sistema literário do (no) Quebec, dentre os quais Pierre Nepveu, serão abordados os elementos fundadores da escrita migrante e o contexto de difusão da obra de escritores vindos de longe. Para exemplificar esse universo e aprofundar sua análise, será focalizada a obra de Dany Laferrière em suas dimensões autobiográfica, fragmentária e transnacional a partir de alguns de seus textos considerados referenciais, nos quais o pacto romanesco dá lugar à autonarração e à problematização das identidades em trânsito na contemporaneidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis→French-language works237,207→