Bibliographic record
Abstract
Révélant l’intimité de leurs auteurs, leurs rêves, leurs espoirs ou leurs désillusions, la littérature personnelle fascine de nombreux chercheurs. Mais, sous leur apparente sincérité, ces sources peuvent devenir de véritables pièges. À travers l’exemple d’un cas particulier, celui de la biographie d’Antoine Gérin-Lajoie par l’abbé Casgrain, cet article invite à réfléchir sur ce problème. Et pour cause, dans cette biographie, constituée pour l’essentiel des écrits intimes de Gérin-Lajoie, la mise en abîme de la littérature personnelle est profonde et chaotique. En dévoilant les diverses étapes de la création de cette oeuvre, de l’écriture de Gérin-Lajoie à celle de Casgrain, cet article présente une enquête critique de cette source. Il s’attarde également sur les liens qui unissent les différents acteurs de la création d’A. Gérin-Lajoie. D’après ses mémoires pour mieux comprendre leurs intentions et le sens de leurs interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".