Forecasting soil temperature based on surface air temperature using a wavelet artificial neural network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil temperature is a very important variable in agricultural meteorology and strongly influences agricultural activities and planning (e.g. the date and depth of sowing crops, frost protection). There are many physically based studies in the literature which model soil temperature, but few are easily applicable for use in the field. Simple and precise short-term forecasting of soil temperature with minimum data requirements is the main goal of this study. The soil temperature at 0300, 0900 and 1500 GMT was forecast based only on surface air temperatures using artificial neural network (ANN) and wavelet transform artificial neural network (WANN) models. The hourly data were collected from the Mashhad synoptic station in Khorasan Razavi province in Iran between 2010 and 2013. The results of this study showed that using a wavelet transform for preprocessing improved the accuracy of soil temperature forecasting. It was also found that changing the temporal increment in forecasting time did not have a noticeable effect on errors in the WANN models. WANN models can be used as accurate tools to forecast soil temperature 1–7 days ahead at depths of 5–30 cm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it