Social movements on the web: uses and communication strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research intends to investigate the uses that the popular movements and not Governmental Organizations (ONGs) of Fortaleza makes of the web. We have observed that in recent years this use became frequent in Brazil. As examples we can check the page of the Radio Favela, in Belo Horizonte, and the site Viva Favela, in Rio de Janeiro, amongst other important national experiences. In Fortaleza, the Ellery Quarter had the closed Radio Mandacaru for the Anatei and meets currently with a site of presentation of the quarter and the popular movement. In the Bom Jardim quarter of Fortaleza we find two ONGs, both using sites. Our research intends to understand the supports and the used languages in the presentation of these sites, observing that these forms supports and languages represent more effective spaces of participation. After this first phase of the field research we have the interest to understand the reasons that take the popular movement to use the practical web as forms of mobilization and construction of its visibility. It is also interesting to verify the results that the communication in net brings for the actors who are involved in these movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".