MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739051192 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-02/11/762

Remote Imaging of the Buried Interface Using AFM-IR

2017· article· en· W2739051192 on OpenAlexaff
S.B. Lyon, Suzanne Morsch, Simon R. Gibbon

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKelvin probe force microscopeCorrosionScanning probe microscopyMaterials scienceMicroscopyCoatingScanning electrochemical microscopyInfrared microscopyScanning thermal microscopyNanoscopic scaleDielectric spectroscopyOptical microscopeComposite materialScanning electron microscopeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyElectrodeOpticsElectrochemistryChemistryAtomic force microscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The degradation of corrosion-resistant organic coatings continues to present an analytical challenge to corrosion scientists. This is because failures in corrosion protection are localised events, whereas coating analysis is predominately performed using bulk methodologies (e.g., vibrational spectroscopy, thermal analysis). This is compounded by the paucity of non-destructive techniques capable of detecting and characterising localised coating failure in the early stages (i.e., able to pinpoint the appearance of buried pitting sites, de-adhesion processes or blistering). Ex-situ microscopy has conventionally been used to characterise corrosion phenomena beneath organic coatings. However, physical sectioning precludes meaningful chemical analysis of the polymer at failure sites. Emerging non-destructive approaches that allow direct detection of corrosion at the buried interface include: acoustic microscopy, local electrochemical techniques (e.g. scanning Kelvin probe microscopy, the scanning vibrating electrode and local electrochemical impedance measurements) and can be employed to monitor corrosion of a buried substrate in situ. Whilst these can examine buried corrosion phenomena, little or no information is obtained about the overlying coating. Alternative techniques with improved resolution utilise scanning probe microscopy (SPM) methods (e.g. Kelvin probe force microscopy, KPFM) whilst detailed topographic images of the overlying coating may be simultaneously collected. More recently, SPM has been coupled to vibrational spectroscopy and allows direct nanoscale mapping of functional group chemistry. AFM-IR is a particularly versatile approach, whereby sub-diffraction limit detection of infrared absorbance is achieved by monitoring the deflection of an AFM probe in response to photo-thermal expansion of the sample. During AFM-IR measurements, the sample is illuminated by a rapidly pulsed tuneable infrared source, (an optical parametric oscillator, 10 ns pulses at a repetition rate of 1 KHz.) Upon absorbance of the infrared radiation, transient thermal expansion of the sample induces a contact-mode AFM probe to oscillate at its resonant frequency. A plot of the amplitude of oscillations as a function of infrared wavelength yields spectra that closely match conventional transmission-mode FTIR. Here we examine the degradation of model epoxy-phenolic can coatings on electrolytic chrome-coated steel (ECCS). Substrate materials were mechanically abraded successively to 1200 grit, then polished to 0.25 µm diamond paste to achieve a mirror-like surface finish. Stoichiometric epoxy-phenolic coatings were prepared by adding 1,1,1-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl) ethane to bisphenol-A diglycidyl ether (epoxide equivalent weight 172-176 g mol -1 ) using tetrabutylphosphonium bromide as catalyst. Coatings were spin-coated onto the substrates at 2000 rpm then cured at 150 °C for 60 min. The final coating thickness was around 7 µm. AFM-IR was performed on a NanoIR2 system (Anasys Instruments). In order to induce corrosion the polished ECCS samples were contaminated by spraying with a saturated sodium chloride solution in ethanol prior to coating. Corrosion was then initiated by placing a droplet of deionised water on the coating surface for 5 minutes, after which it was dried. Examination of the sample by optical microscopy subsequently revealed isolated patches of underfilm discolouration discernible through the coating (a). However, no corresponding change in the coating morphology was observed in AFM height images (b), and infrared amplitude maps obtained at 1260 cm -1 (c) and 1604 cm -1 (d) also remained featureless, indicating that significant deformation of the coating had not taken place. In contrast, infrared maps gathered at 916 cm -1 (e) and 1800 cm -1 (f) showed an enhanced signal at the locus of discolouration. Preliminary results using AFM-IR mapping has been shown to detect the steel-polymer interface buried beneath an epoxy-phenolic coating. Generated infrared absorbance maps are sensitive to the substrate composition and morphology, opening up a new avenue for the detection of buried corrosion phenomena. Detection of the interface is dependent upon both the wavelength and power of incident infrared illumination. This is a result of the variable penetration depth of the radiation, in turn dependent on the infrared wavelength and laser power employed. Thus, judicious selection of infrared parameters permits the selective probing of the infrared absorbance of the coating alone, or a combination coating heterogeneity and interfacial reflectance. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207