MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739092155 · doi:10.5751/es-09334-220302

Balancing carrots and sticks in REDD+: implications for social safeguards

2017· article· en· W2739092155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amy E. Duchelle, Claudio de Sassi, Pamela Jagger, Marina Cromberg, Anne Larson, William D. Sunderlin, S. Atmadja, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Christy Desta Pratama

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidConsortium of International Agricultural Research CentersDepartment for International DevelopmentBundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und ReaktorsicherheitDepartment of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian GovernmentEuropean Commission
KeywordsBusinessEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duchelle, A. E., C. de Sassi, P. Jagger, M. Cromberg, A. M. Larson, W. D. Sunderlin, S. S. Atmadja, I. A. P. Resosudarmo, and C. D. Pratama. 2017. Balancing carrots and sticks in REDD+: implications for social safeguards. Ecology and Society 22(3):2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09334-220302

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and SocietySame topicBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207