MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739096960

Teorizando la acción colectiva en los conflictos socioambientales del Perú actual: el caso del conflicto de “Tía María” (2009-2011)

2013· article· es· W2739096960 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Quintanilla Bedregal, Rogelio Scott

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeasantCollective actionPolitical scienceWelfare economicsGeographyPoliticsHumanitiesEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the mobilizations of the peasants of Tambo's valley in Peru, against the implementation of a great mine of extraction of copper to open quarry, between the years 2009 and 2011. Using this case of peasant mobilization, authors test the analytical value of several theoretic frames for the analysis of the collective action in socioenvironmental conflicts: the structural tension model; the resource mobilization model; the political process model; and the model of threat and opportunity. The article explores the constraints and advantages of the several theoretical frames, and finds that the model of threat and opportunity offers analytical advantages to understand the peasant mobilizations in Peru, and offer bigger adaptability and flexibility for their analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207