MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739120264 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(98)83045-7

10.1016/s0967-0653(98)83045-7

2000· article· en· W2739120264 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marijo Oršulić, Luko Milić, Nikša Koboević

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U radu se sustavno i koncizno analizira problematika nastanka požara u brodskoj strojarnici i potreba poduzimanja preventivnih mjera. U uvodnom dijelu ukazano je na opasnosti od požara u brodskoj strojarnici i na mjesta s visokim rizikom nastanka požara. Posebna pozornost je posvecena analizi godisnjeg broja požara, broju požara prema namjeni brodova i broju požara prema tonaži brodova. Također je analiziran broj požara prema starosti brodova, vremenu nastanka požara, nastanak požara za vrijeme plovidbe, boravka u luci, sidristu, brodogradilistu itd. Nakon toga analizirani su nacini otkrivanja požara i najvise rabljeni nacini gasenja požara. Dobiveni rezultati su vrlo indikartivni na osnovu kojih se predlaži preventivne mjere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0100.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9870.989

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207