Peace Education and Child Protection in Educational Settings for Elementary School in the West Papua of Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This qualitative research has purpose in order to get deep meaning of peace education and child protection in the Papua island, Indonesia, relate with (1) how children at risk at home or in the community; (2)how situational factors affecting child protection in schools relate with bullying (physical, verbal and psychological abuse) by staff and peers; (3) how peace building and child protection policy for educational settings in the elementary school. Location of the research was in two districts, such as: Teluk Bintuni and Fakfak.The result of this research indicate that peace building and child protection canbe intepreted based on: (1) strong education in the family; (2) the importance of attention to the socially outside of school; (3) atmosphere environment in school; (4) strengthen of friendship peers in the school; (5) atmosphere in the classroom; (6) methods of theaching by teacher; (7) strengthen the role of teaches as educator; (8) strengthen relationship teacher-student-parent; (9) exempary habituation; (10) implementation of curriculum-based character in the teaching learning process; (11) strengthen of character education; (12) strengthen the role of school principal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it