ESTRANHAMENTO E SENSORIALIDADE NA EXPERIÊNCIA DA PSICANÁLISE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DOI: 10.12957/polemica.2017.29609 _______ O artigo aborda o tema da experiência estética em sua relação com a clínica psicanalítica. Será analisado o papel do estranhamento, a partir das considerações de Sigmund Freud, para apresentar alcances teóricos novos à experiência estética. As noções de estética, em Freud, estão em diálogo com o trabalho de Loureiro, ao centrar a discussão até o momento cujo pensamento do estranhamento aparece como ponto fundamental da Síndrome de Stendhal . A partir deste ponto, há um desdobramento a ser incorporado pela clínica contemporânea, através de conceito de saída de si , por Gagnebin, e o conceito de saisissement, por M’Uzan. O artigo chega, então, até as discussões do dramaturgo Antonin Artaud com sua experiência do teatro da crueldade , ao reinterpretar a noção da obra de arte anterior ao domínio da palavra. Palavras-chave: Estranho. Saisissement . Estética. Experiência. _______________________ Abstract: The article addresses the theme of aesthetic experience in its relationship with psychoanalytic clinic. It will be analyzed the role of estrangement from the considerations of Sigmund Freud to present new theoretical approaches to the aesthetic experience. The aesthetics notions, in Freud, are in dialogue with the work of Loureiro, by focusing the discussion until the moment whose thought of estrangement appears as the fundamental point of the Stendhal Syndrome . From this point, there is an unfolding to be incorporated by the contemporary clinic through Gagnebin's concept of self-exiting , and the concept of saisissement , by M'Uzan. The article reaches then the discussions of the playwright Antonin Artaud with his experience of the theater of cruelty , while reinterpreting the notion of the work of art prior to the domain of the word. Keywords: Strange. Saisissement . Aesthetics. Experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".