MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739311779 · doi:10.12789/geocanj.2017.44.117

Great Canadian Lagerstätten 6. Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve, Southeast Newfoundland

2017· article· en· W2739311779 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Alexander Liu, Jack Matthews

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMitacsNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsTaphonomyLagerstätteGeographyPaleoecologyContext (archaeology)TaxonArchaeologyPaleontologyBenthic zoneGeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve (MPER) World Heritage Site, on the southeastern coast of Newfoundland, Canada, is one of the foremost global Ediacaran fossil localities. MPER contains some of the oldest known assemblages of the soft-bodied Ediacaran macrobiota, and its fossils have contributed significantly to Ediacaran paleobiological research since their initial discovery in 1967. Preservation of multiple in situ benthic paleocommunities, some comprising thousands of specimens, has enabled research into Ediacaran paleoecology, ontogeny, taphonomy, taxonomy and morphology, offering insights into the possible phylogenetic positions of Ediacaran taxa within the tree of life. Meanwhile, a thick and continuous geological record enables the fossils to be placed within a well-resolved temporal and paleoenvironmental context spanning an interval of at least 10 million years. This article reviews the history of paleontological research at MPER, and highlights key discoveries that have shaped global thinking on the Ediacaran macrobiota.RÉSUMÉLe site du Patrimoine mondial de la Réserve écologique de Mistaken Point (MPER), sur la côte sud-est de Terre-Neuve, au Canada, est l'une des principales localités fossilifères édiacariennes de la planète. Le MPER renferme quelques-uns des plus anciens assemblages connus de macrobiote édicarien à parties molles, et ses fossiles ont contribué de manière significative à la recherche paléobiologique édiacarienne depuis leur découverte en 1967. La préservation de multiples paléocommunautés benthiques in situ, dont certaines comptant des milliers de spécimens, a permis de faire des recherches en paléoécologie, ontogenèse, taphonomie, taxonomie et morphologie de biotes édiacariens, ce qui a permis d’avoir un aperçu de différentes positions phylogénétiques possibles des taxons édiacariens dans l'arborescence biologique. Aussi, grâce à une colonne géologique épaisse et continue, on a pu placer ces fossiles dans un contexte temporel et paléoenvironnemental bien circonscrit qui s’étend sur un intervalle d'au moins 10 millions d'années. Cet article passe en revue l'histoire de la recherche paléontologique au MPER et souligne les découvertes majeures qui ont façonné la réflexion sur le macrobiote édiacarien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207