MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739403440 · doi:10.3968/9738

The Nonverbal Language in Cross-Cultural Communication and Its Application in International Business Negotiation

2017· article· en· W2739403440 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hou Yan-fang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonverbal communicationNegotiationBusiness communicationPsychologyCross-cultural communicationInterpersonal communicationIntercultural communicationInternational businessComputer scienceCommunicationSociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonverbal communication is an essential and inseparable part of human communication. Due to limited knowledge of nonverbal language in cross-cultural communication, misunderstanding and abuse of nonverbal language exists in international business negotiation. Hence it is of great significance to have an intensive study of the application of nonverbal language in international business negotiation so as to promote the efficiency and validity of business negotiation. This paper firstly introduced the definition, classification and impact factors of nonverbal language and then mainly discusses the application strategies of nonverbal language in international business.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207