MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Functional Characterization of Three VWF- A1 Domain Mutations Causing Type 2 Von Willebrand Disease.

2009· article· en· W2739420956 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maha Othman, Rouzbeh Chegeni, Linda M. Vickars, Emmanuel J. Favaloro, David Lillicrap

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand diseasePlateletVon Willebrand factorMolecular biologyMutantRecombinant DNAMutationRistocetinChemistryTransfectionComplementary DNAWild typeGeneImmunologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1305 Poster Board I-327 Through the Canadian Platelet-Type VWD Project (www.pt-vwd.org), we have identified 3 novel candidate mutations within the A1 domain of VWF gene in 5 patients that were provisionally diagnosed as type 2 VWD. These mutations are: L1460F (2 related patients), Y1363C (1 patient), E1389K (2 related patients). The VWF:Ag ranged from 0.19 – 0.54 IU/mL, VWF:RCo ranged from 0.19- 0.21 IU/mL and platelet count ranged from 206-254 × 103/ mm3. High Molecular weight multimers of VWF were absent in the plasma of the patient with the 1460 aa change. These substitutions have not been previously reported in the literature or in the International VWF Mutation Database. All three mutations were created by site-directed mutagenesis in the full-length huVWF cDNA and transiently transfected in the HEK293T/17 cell line. The VWF protein secreted in the media was collected and quantified by ELISA before proceeding with Functional VWF-platelet binding studies. Quantification of the mutant rVWF proteins in the media and cell lysates and multimer analysis of the proteins showed normal secretion and multimer distributions. To determine the GpIb binding properties of the putative mutants, the VWF recombinant protein (0.25 ug) from each of the WT and three mutants was incubated with lyophilized platelets (1 × 108) for 10 minutes at 25°C with different concentrations of ristocetin between 0-1 mg/mL. The platelets were then pelleted by centrifugation at 1200 g and the resulting supernatant was tested for the remaining unbound VWF by ELISA. Compared to the WT VWF protein, only the L1460F mutant showed increased platelet binding under lower concentration of ristocetin. Ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) assays performed using these recombinant proteins confirmed enhanced ristocetin responsiveness for L1460F, and that Y1363C and E1389K alternatively showed reduced responsiveness. Based on these data, a type 2B VWD diagnosis can only be made with respect the L1460F and not the other two A1 domain missense mutations. These data confirm once again that the assignment of the phenotype on clinical and laboratory basis is useful prior to genetic analysis and mutation identification. However, in some situations both will be ultimately required to understand the clinical presentation and to assign a disease subtype. Disclosures Vickars: Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→