Functional Characterization of Three VWF- A1 Domain Mutations Causing Type 2 Von Willebrand Disease.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 1305 Poster Board I-327 Through the Canadian Platelet-Type VWD Project (www.pt-vwd.org), we have identified 3 novel candidate mutations within the A1 domain of VWF gene in 5 patients that were provisionally diagnosed as type 2 VWD. These mutations are: L1460F (2 related patients), Y1363C (1 patient), E1389K (2 related patients). The VWF:Ag ranged from 0.19 – 0.54 IU/mL, VWF:RCo ranged from 0.19- 0.21 IU/mL and platelet count ranged from 206-254 × 103/ mm3. High Molecular weight multimers of VWF were absent in the plasma of the patient with the 1460 aa change. These substitutions have not been previously reported in the literature or in the International VWF Mutation Database. All three mutations were created by site-directed mutagenesis in the full-length huVWF cDNA and transiently transfected in the HEK293T/17 cell line. The VWF protein secreted in the media was collected and quantified by ELISA before proceeding with Functional VWF-platelet binding studies. Quantification of the mutant rVWF proteins in the media and cell lysates and multimer analysis of the proteins showed normal secretion and multimer distributions. To determine the GpIb binding properties of the putative mutants, the VWF recombinant protein (0.25 ug) from each of the WT and three mutants was incubated with lyophilized platelets (1 × 108) for 10 minutes at 25°C with different concentrations of ristocetin between 0-1 mg/mL. The platelets were then pelleted by centrifugation at 1200 g and the resulting supernatant was tested for the remaining unbound VWF by ELISA. Compared to the WT VWF protein, only the L1460F mutant showed increased platelet binding under lower concentration of ristocetin. Ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) assays performed using these recombinant proteins confirmed enhanced ristocetin responsiveness for L1460F, and that Y1363C and E1389K alternatively showed reduced responsiveness. Based on these data, a type 2B VWD diagnosis can only be made with respect the L1460F and not the other two A1 domain missense mutations. These data confirm once again that the assignment of the phenotype on clinical and laboratory basis is useful prior to genetic analysis and mutation identification. However, in some situations both will be ultimately required to understand the clinical presentation and to assign a disease subtype. Disclosures Vickars: Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".