Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“I had a very strange dream last night,” Tweedledum said to Tweedledee. “I dreamt that we were not twins but quintuplets.” “What were the names of the others?” asked Tweedledee. “One of them was called Tweedledoo. I don't remember the other two, but they were also Tweedle-something. We had done something that was only possible in a dream. We made the Queen of Hearts happy. She rewarded us with enough tarts to fill the entire pantry. It was still daytime then, and we were to share the tarts equally in the evening.” “I wish I have dreams like that, even if it is only a dream. What happened next?” “The pantry was guarded by the Duchess's Cook. Sometime during the day, she suggested to me that I should make sure that I got my fair share. She took me inside, and helped me divide the tarts into five equal piles. There was one left over. I gave that to her while I ate my pile. Then we put the rest of the tarts back together. During the course of the day, I noticed that you and the other three went into the pantry one at a time with the Duchess's Cook, and each time, she came out eating a tart.” “So the Duchess's crook made the same crooked deal with all of us.” “By the time we divided the tarts in the evening, there were a lot less than before. Nobody spoke up. So I assume that each of us was as guilty as the others. The tarts now came out in five equal shares.” “How many tarts were there altogether?” “I was too stuffed to count. Let us ask Alice and see if she can figure it out.” “This problem belongs to the type called Diophantine problems,” said Alice, “named after the Greek mathematician Diophantus . Such problems lead to what are called Diophantine equations . They look just like ordinary algebraic equations, except that only integral solutions are accepted.” “This is not unreasonable,” said Tweedledum. “The answers to most problems are supposed to be positive integers.” “So how many tarts were there in my twin brother's dream?” Bezoutian Algorithm An important result in the last chapter is the following.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it