MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739543091 · doi:10.5948/9781614441199.007

Linear Diophantine Equations

2015· book-chapter· en· W2739543091 on OpenAlexaff
Andy Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mathematical Society eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiophantine equationMathematicsApplied mathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“I had a very strange dream last night,” Tweedledum said to Tweedledee. “I dreamt that we were not twins but quintuplets.” “What were the names of the others?” asked Tweedledee. “One of them was called Tweedledoo. I don't remember the other two, but they were also Tweedle-something. We had done something that was only possible in a dream. We made the Queen of Hearts happy. She rewarded us with enough tarts to fill the entire pantry. It was still daytime then, and we were to share the tarts equally in the evening.” “I wish I have dreams like that, even if it is only a dream. What happened next?” “The pantry was guarded by the Duchess's Cook. Sometime during the day, she suggested to me that I should make sure that I got my fair share. She took me inside, and helped me divide the tarts into five equal piles. There was one left over. I gave that to her while I ate my pile. Then we put the rest of the tarts back together. During the course of the day, I noticed that you and the other three went into the pantry one at a time with the Duchess's Cook, and each time, she came out eating a tart.” “So the Duchess's crook made the same crooked deal with all of us.” “By the time we divided the tarts in the evening, there were a lot less than before. Nobody spoke up. So I assume that each of us was as guilty as the others. The tarts now came out in five equal shares.” “How many tarts were there altogether?” “I was too stuffed to count. Let us ask Alice and see if she can figure it out.” “This problem belongs to the type called Diophantine problems,” said Alice, “named after the Greek mathematician Diophantus . Such problems lead to what are called Diophantine equations . They look just like ordinary algebraic equations, except that only integral solutions are accepted.” “This is not unreasonable,” said Tweedledum. “The answers to most problems are supposed to be positive integers.” “So how many tarts were there in my twin brother's dream?” Bezoutian Algorithm An important result in the last chapter is the following.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Mathematical Society eBooksSame topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207