MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739602535 · doi:10.5555/3106388.3106401

Towards the design of an interoperable multi-cloud distributed simulation system

2017· article· en· W2739602535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Simulation Symposium · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingInteroperabilityDistributed computingComputer scienceCloud testingUsabilityFlexibility (engineering)Cloud computing securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulations over Cloud environments introduce additional benefits from Cloud Computing to conventional distributed simulations, including elasticity on computation resource, cost saving on investment, and convenience of service accessibility. There exist some works that attempt to apply Cloud computing on distributed simulation. However, there is one significant drawback on those works: lack of interoperability across Cloud platforms, which limits the usability and flexibility of distributed simulation over Cloud environment substantially. Thus, we propose a novel interoperable multi-Cloud distributed simulation system. This system is based on existing approaches in deploying distributed simulation systems over the Cloud environment. Our proposed system integrates Cloud computing to conventional distributed simulations, addressing the interoperability issues of distributed simulation on Cloud environments and enhancing the capability of traditional HLA-based simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it