MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2739614293 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4499

Abstract 4499: The oncometabolite fumarate prevents hypoxia-induced ER stress by enhancing the pentose phosphate pathway

2017· article· en· W2739614293 on OpenAlexaff
Luana Schito, Sergio Rey, Bradly G. Wouters, Marianne Koritzinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnfolded protein responseDownregulation and upregulationThapsigarginIntegrated stress responseCancer researchTunicamycinProteostasisBiologyCell biologyChemistryEndoplasmic reticulumMolecular biologyBiochemistryMessenger RNAGeneTranslation (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cancer cells co-opt mechanisms of adaptation to hypoxia to minimize energy expenditure and halt proliferation thereby increasing hypoxic tolerance, a major factor contributing to chemo- and radioresistance in patients. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) kinase PERK is one of the three signaling transducers of the unfolded protein response (UPR) that inhibits mRNA translation via eIF2α phosphorylation to alleviate hypoxia-induced ER stress. We have previously shown that accumulation of fumarate, resulting from loss-of-function (LOF) of the mitochondrial enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH), augments the antioxidant capacity of hypoxic cancer cells through upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). Here, we report for the first time that the fumarate-dependent increase of antioxidants generated by the PPP prevents hypoxic activation of the PERK→eIF2α axis enabling protein synthesis and proliferation leading to an impairment of hypoxic tolerance. HeLa (cervix), HCT-116 and LS174T (colon) adenocarcinoma cells were transfected with lentiviral vectors encoding for shRNAs targeting FH. Immunoblot assays showed that FH LOF impaired PERK activity under hypoxia thus inactivating eIF2α. Moreover, the ability of fumarate to prevent PERK activation was specific to hypoxia since fumarate did not affect the pharmacological activation of the UPR by thapsigargin, DTT or tunicamycin. A comprehensive analysis utilizing a RT-qPCR array to profile the mRNA expression of 84 UPR genes, showed that FH LOF inhibited the UPR in HCT-116 cells. A similar response was observed in patient-derived UOK262 kidney cancer cells whereby bi-allelic FH mutations resulted in downregulation of 72% of the UPR genes whereas FH re-introduction restored UPR signaling. We employed LS174T mucinous adenocarcinoma cells as a model to assess protein synthesis. Mucin synthesis was not affected in hypoxic FH deficient cells whereas it was abrogated in wild-type cells. Consistent with these results, FH LOF increased 3D spheroid growth and decreased clonogenic potential in HCT-116 and HeLa cells. Pharmacological inhibition of the PPP by 6-aminonicotinamide activated the PERK→eIF2α axis in FH silenced cells thereby suggesting that PPP activation by fumarate is implicated in PERK inhibition. RNAseq data analysis in melanoma, prostate, colon, breast, lung and renal cancers from TCGA cohorts shows a negative correlation between PERK and the PPP enzyme PGLS suggesting that the mechanism hereby delineated occurs in cancer patients. In conclusion, we show that fumarate impairs PERK→eIF2α UPR signaling in hypoxic cancer cells. Clinical and molecular data show that UPR activation is one of the mechanisms responsible for chemo- and radioresistance in hypoxic tumors. This study suggests that fumarate accumulation (either through extrinsic or FH LOF) represents a novel approach to target hypoxic cancer cells and improve patient prognosis. Citation Format: Luana Schito, Sergio Rey, Bradly G. Wouters, Marianne Koritzinsky. The oncometabolite fumarate prevents hypoxia-induced ER stress by enhancing the pentose phosphate pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4499. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4499

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→