MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739711225 · doi:10.1177/0954411917719742

Oval housing for the St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve

2017· article· en· W2739711225 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadi Mohammadi, Guy Fradet

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsMechanical heart-valveHemodynamicsThrombogenicityCardiologyInternal medicineMechanical heartRegurgitation (circulation)Pressure dropHeart valveBlood flowMedicineBiomedical engineeringMechanicsPhysicsThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late 1970s. The basic idea for the design of the valve is simply two semicircular flat plates pivoting on hinges. The overall performance of St. Jude Medical valves such as blood flow being central, the leaflets opening completely, and the pressure drop across the valve being trivial is satisfactory. St. Jude Medical valves provide an improved hemodynamics compared to the other mechanical heart valve models; however, their non-physiological hemodynamics which may lead to red blood cells lysis and thrombogenicity still remains a major issue. In this study, we hypothesize that applying ovality to the housing might improve their hemodynamics significantly which is based on the fact that the native annulus is oval by nature. A quick but precise numerical model based on the finite strip method was developed by which the regurgitation flow volume and velocity of the proposed design were assessed in the closing phase. The results are satisfactory and an improved hemodynamics is observed. The proposed design can be considered for further numerical and experimental studies and shows promise and merits further development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in MedicineSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207