Des archives de Jean-Claude Dondel aux archives de l’administration : des sources qui renseignent sur les collaborations entre architectes et artistes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au sortir de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, l’État crée une administration placée sous l’autorité du ministère de l’Éducation nationale ayant pour vocation de réaliser les établissements scolaires devant accueillir les élèves de tous les niveaux, la direction de l’Équipement scolaire universitaire et sportif (DESUS). Entre 1950 et 1970, elle sollicitera de nombreux architectes, dont Jean-Claude Dondel (1904-1989) qui réalise de nombreux établissements sur l’ensemble du territoire français. Ses réalisations se caractérisent par la volonté de voir le 1% décoratif faire partie intégrante de l’architecture. Cet article propose d’évoquer les sources qui permettent de retracer l’histoire de ces collaborations entre l’architecte et les artistes, mais aussi celle des œuvres d’art depuis leur réalisation. Parmi elles figurent les archives que l’exemple de Jean-Claude Dondel donne l’occasion d’évoquer plus particulièrement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".