MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract LB-088: Role of histone demethylase JMJD1A in the generation of AR-V7

2017· article· en· W2739741429 on OpenAlexaff
Lingling Fan, Fengbo Zhang, Martin Gleave, Xuesen Dong, Jianfei Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerGene knockdownDemethylaseAndrogen receptorRNA splicingCancer researchHistoneAlternative splicingChemistryCancerBiologyMedicineMessenger RNAGeneInternal medicineBiochemistryRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Formation of androgen receptor (AR) splicing variant, AR-V7, has been shown to contribute to the resistance of prostate cancer to androgen deprivation therapy and development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We and others have reported that histone demethylase JMJD1A promotes the transcriptional activity of AR by functioning as an AR co-activator. Here, we identified a new role for JMJD1A in the expression of AR-V7 in prostate cancer cells. Knockdown of JMJD1A reduced the mRNA and protein level of AR-V7 but had little effect on the full-length AR (AR-FL). Re-expression of AR-V7 in the JMJD1A-knockdown cells partly restored the expression of select AR target genes and growth of prostate cancer cells under the androgen deprivation condition in vitro and in the mouse xenograft model. Our preliminary data show that JMJD1A promotes the alternative splicing of AR-V7 and we are currently investigating the splicing factor(s) regulated by JMJD1A for the AR-V7 formation. Together, our data reveal that JMJD1A enhances the castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer cells by promoting the alternative splicing of AR-V7. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Lingling Fan, Fengbo Zhang, Martin Gleave, Xuesen Dong, Jianfei Qi. Role of histone demethylase JMJD1A in the generation of AR-V7 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-088. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-088

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→