MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739856746

Quasi-embeddings and intersections of latin squares of different orders.

2009· article· en· W2739856746 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Dukes, Eric Mendelsohn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLatin squareIdempotenceEmbeddingCombinatoricsIntersection (aeronautics)GeneralizationDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeographyArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a common generalization of the embedding and intersection problems for latin squares. Specifically, we extend the definition of embedding to squares whose sides do not meet the necessary condition for embedding and extend the intersection problem to squares of different orders. Results are given for arbitrary latin squares, and those which are idempotent and idempotent symmetric. The latter topic is interpreted in terms of one-factorizations of the complete graph. Similar problems for Steiner triple systems, which can be regarded as totally symmetric idempotent latin squares, had been previously investigated by the authors, along with P. Danziger and T. Griggs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207