MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739974442 · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.97

Morphology of Dbx1 respiratory neurons in the preBötzinger complex and reticular formation of neonatal mice

2017· article· en· W2739974442 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria T Akins, Krishanthi Weragalaarachchi, Maria Cristina D. Picardo, Ann L. Revill, Christopher A. Del Negro

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsReticular connective tissueBrainstemNeuroscienceReticular formationBiologyRespiratory systemBiological neural networkMedullaMedulla oblongataNeuronAnatomyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between neuron morphology and function is a perennial issue in neuroscience. Information about synaptic integration, network connectivity, and the specific roles of neuronal subpopulations can be obtained through morphological analysis of key neurons within a microcircuit. Here we present morphologies of two classes of brainstem respiratory neurons. First, interneurons derived from Dbx1-expressing precursors (Dbx1 neurons) in the preBötzinger complex (preBötC) of the ventral medulla that generate the rhythm for inspiratory breathing movements. Second, Dbx1 neurons of the intermediate reticular formation that influence the motor pattern of pharyngeal and lingual movements during the inspiratory phase of the breathing cycle. We describe the image acquisition and subsequent digitization of morphologies of respiratory Dbx1 neurons from the preBötC and the intermediate reticular formation that were first recorded in vitro. These data can be analyzed comparatively to examine how morphology influences the roles of Dbx1 preBötC and Dbx1 reticular interneurons in respiration and can also be utilized to create morphologically accurate compartmental models for simulation and modeling of respiratory circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207