Impact factor-based group recommendation scheme with privacy preservation in MSNs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile Social Networks (MSNs) provide a variety of social networking applications in mobile environment, where social group finds and recruits potential members easily. Unfortunately, users enjoy these conveniences at the cost of revealing their personal data. Additionally, people usually ignore a critical factor, Impact Factor (IF), which is used to quantify group members' influence on their groups, since a group member with larger IF generally has a greater influence on potential new member recommendation. In this paper, we propose IF-RG, an IF-based group recommendation scheme with privacy preservation in MSNs. First, we construct a transmission matrix and exploit PageRank algorithm to compute and update group members' IFs. The average variation of IF is formed to measure convergence speed of the iteration method of computing IF. To make sure that the larger IFs, the more influence, IF, Ochiai similarity function and weighted majority rule are integrated in the novel matching degree between stranger and group. The fuzzy matrix algorithm not only protects users' privacy, but also helps our scheme to support group recommendation when not every one in the groups is online. Finally, security and performance are analyzed and evaluated via detailed simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".