MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740082970

Canada, Canadians, and the War in Indochina: A Few Common Interests?

2006· article· en· W2740082970 on OpenAlex
Magali Deleuze

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWORDForeign policyPower (physics)DiplomacyCommunismPolitical scienceColonialismSpanish Civil WarPolitical economyLawSociologyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The birth of Canadian foreign policy after the Second World War seemed to be the perfect moment for Canada in the 1950s to rekindle its interest in France. The colonial problems of the French Fourth Republic were a worry to Canada, and the First Indochina War provided the new Canadian External Affairs team with its first opportunity to involve itself in diplomacy. Canada was able to rebuild its relations with France upon a combination of two policies : « non-indifference » and « non-interference ». The basis for this foreign policy was Canada's recognition of the new Associated States of Indochina, its support of French military operations in South East Asia through the Mutual Aid Programme, and the help of a Canadian public that supported the fight against communism. However, this policy was a double-edged sword. On the one hand, Canada wanted to project itself as a new middle-sized power without great power responsibilities, and, on the other hand, the nation's leaders wanted to avoid any entanglements in Indochina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it