MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740187823 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4258

Abstract 4258: Influence of lifestyle factors on adipocyte size in human breast tissue

2017· article· en· W2740187823 on OpenAlexaff
Kristin L. Campbell, Nagarajan Kannan, Sarah Neil‐Sztramko, Connie J. Eaves, Jonathan P. Little, Ilona Csizmadi, David A. H. Zhu, Sarah Sayyari, K I Bland, James D. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryTerry Fox Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdipose tissueBreast cancerAdipocyteBody mass indexInternal medicineObesityEndocrinologyPhysiologyPathologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Accumulating epidemiological studies positively associate healthy body mass index (BMI) and higher physical activity with lowered risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Many of the proposed biomarkers underlying these associations, such as insulin, inflammatory markers, steroid hormones, and adipokines, are produced or regulated by adipose tissue. However, the biological impact of lifestyle factors at the level of the breast tissue, particularly adipose tissue in the breast, is unclear and may play a role in the etiology of breast cancer. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, we examined the impact of demographic and lifestyle factors on histological features of breast adipose tissue. Women (age) undergoing reduction mammoplasty surgery were consented to collection of their cancer-free breast tissue at the time of surgery. An adipose rich section of the sample was dissected under sterile conditions and formalin fixed. Samples were sectioned at 7 µm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The stained sections were imaged and mean adipocyte size was determined as diameter (µm) from 3 randomly selected areas at 10X magnification and each sample was scored by two independent assessors using Image J software. BMI status documented at the time of surgery was abstracted form medical records. A subset of women completed an additional visit where percent total body fat was measured by air displacement plethysmography and aerobic fitness (VO2peak) was measured by a maximal graded exercise test with expired gas collection. The association between adipocyte size and demographic/lifestyle factors was examined using multivariate linear regression adjusted for age and menopausal status. Results: Participants (n=42) were primarily Caucasian (77%) and pre/peri-menopausal (62%), with a mean age of 44.6±12.9 years (range 19-70) and mean BMI of 27.7±5.1 kg/m2 (range 19.1-37.4). Adipocyte size was associated with BMI (per 5 kg/m2 increase, β = 5.6±2.15, p=0.01) and number of pregnancies (β = 6.04±2.34, p=0.02), but not age (β = 0.1±0.3, p=0.81). In the subset of participants who completed an additional study visit (n=9), there was a trend towards an inverse association between adipocyte size and aerobic fitness (per 2 ml/kg/min of O2 consumption, β = -3.54±1.52, p=0.07) and percent body fat (per 2% increase, β = 1.94±1.28, p=0.17) in unadjusted analyses. Conclusion: Higher BMI is associated with larger adipocyte size in adipose tissue taken from the breast, suggesting a biological role for body composition in influencing gross histological features of adipocytes and its behavior that would impact the health of the mammary gland. A better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the observed epidemiological associations are needed to guide the development of intervention strategies and the most effective public health messages for breast cancer prevention. Citation Format: Kristin L. Campbell, Nagarajan Kannan, Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko, Connie J. Eaves, Jonathan P. Little, Ilona Csizmadi, David Zhu, Sarah Sayyari, Kelcey Bland, James D. Johnson. Influence of lifestyle factors on adipocyte size in human breast tissue [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4258. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4258

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207