Investigation the Interrelationship of physical transformations of historical quarters on the inhabitant’s social identity Case study: historic Armenians quarter of Isfahan (Julfa)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Historic urban fabrics are situated among of modern cities as the remained heritage of past cities. In Iran, the number of historic cities and their fabrics are significant and each of them are standing in specific level of historical authenticity and physical diversity. In the contemporary era, Iranian’s historic fabrics are confronting with the collapse of their social and traditional foundations and have putted in unstable social and physical condition. This article has organized based on this hypothesis that physical changes in the historical quarters has a direct interrelationship with spatial changes. Isfahan’s Julfa is a unique historic quarter with antiquity of almost four centuries which has encountered with declining its social and historical values. This study sought to discover the current spatial changes and their reasons in Julfa. The results of this survey show that contemporary Isfahan’s development plans which has imposed to the historic fabric without cognition its context and cultural values as well as urban planners failure in integration of Armenian’s social position has caused much spatial changes in Julfa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".